Impact
of the City of Santa Cruz Downtown Ordinances on People Who Get Their Daily
Living Money From Panhandling
Panhandling
or begging is a significant source of income for many homeless people in Santa
Cruz County. In order to determine
the possible numbers of people who might be impacted by city ordinances that may
discourage panhandling a good source of information is the Santa Cruz County
Homeless 2000 Census and Needs Assessment Report.
The report is a presentation of the findings of a Census and Needs Assessment Survey conducted by Applied Survey Research (ASR) in March and April of 2000 for the Community Assessment Project of Santa Cruz County under the auspices of the United Way.
The
report included questions about income including panhandling. From the report it
is clear that as many as 11% of the survey respondents get their daily living
money from Panhandling, more than SSI or General Assistance.[1]
We can project, potentially, 350 homeless people in Santa Cruz County may
panhandle at any given time or 940 people over the course of a year.
The City of Santa Cruz area accounted for 1,273 or 39% of the homeless
people counted in the Census.[2]
Panhandling is much more predominant in Santa Cruz than elsewhere in the county (15% vs. 3%). We can project that 15% of the people who are homeless in Santa Cruz (191 people at a given point in time, or potentially up to 495 people annually) rely on panhandling as a source of income.
The
report also shows that people who are vehicularly housed tend to rely on
panhandling more than other groups of homeless people.
The survey indicated that 15.6% of vehicularly housed people get their
daily living money from Panhandling (which projects out to 153 of the 982
vehicularly housed people that were counted in the homeless Census).[3]
The
Report was made up of two very different tools, a direct count called the Census
and a series of over 60 questions referred to as the Survey.
From the two report tools, were able to project from the survey questions
the characteristics of the 3,293 people counted in the census.
The
Census (not to be confused with the US Census) was designed to count the number
of homeless people in Santa Cruz County. The Census counted 3,293 people in
Transitional shelters (1,068) 32%, Vehicularly housed (982) 30%, living on the
street (626) 19%, in emergency shelters (324) 10% and miscellaneous (293) 8%
including motels, jail, Dominican hospital, rehab programs, etc.
See page 6 of the report. [4]
The report also annualized the Homeless Census point in time finding with
a turnover rate of 2.59 to determine an estimated 8,558 people homeless in Santa
Cruz County over the course of a year.[5]
The
Survey, asked over 60 questions of 811 people who were homeless. Question 14 on
page 93 asks, "Which of the following describes your current living
situation?". The 807 responses
are as follows: Staying in a shelter (217) 26%, Staying with friends/family
(158) 19.6%, Outdoors (138) 17.1%, Living in transitional housing (100) 12.4%,
Have own place (77) 9.5%, automobile/van (63) 7.8%. [6]
It
is significant that the Census counted (982) or 30% of homeless people who are
vehicularly housed. However,
only (63) 7.8% of those participating in the Survey were vehicularly housed.
In attempting to determine why so many vehicularly housed people did not
participate in the Survey we reviewed the vehicularly housed cross tabulation. A
number of findings give us a clue as to the reasons. Although fewer vehicularly
housed people are likely to have young children those that did (under age 2
(10%) and between age 2 and 4 (14%) none used county services such as TANF,
Healthy Families, JTPA, or programs through Pioneer house and Community Housing,
Vocational Rehabilitation, or an EDD Job Search. [7]
Since
the Survey was conducted at points of service to homeless people we concluded
that vehicularly housed people seemed to be less likely to take advantage of the
many services available to people living in or near poverty in the county.
In
conclusion, it is clear that a significant number of people who make use of
panhandling as a significant source of income will be affected by the City of
Santa Cruz “Downtown Ordinances”. It
is essential that a procedure for evaluating the benefits and deficits of the
new ordinances be implemented. Such
an evaluation should be conducted in as non-political a manner as possible by
professionals with the ability to work with all stakeholders to develop a tool
and analysis that will, when complete, be able to answer two significant
questions. One; are the new
ordinances succeeding in reducing the antisocial behaviors that they were
intended to reduce, and two; is unnecessary hardship being created for people
that must, of necessity, get their daily living money from Panhandling.
CAB, Inc. recommends that the City approach a professional survey team such as Applied Survey Research, the scientists behind the Santa Cruz County Homeless 2000 Census and Needs Assessment, to begin the process of designing such a survey tool.
[1] The United Way, Santa Cruz County Homeless 2000 Census and Needs Assessment, Print Version, Overall Findings, page 103
[2] The United Way, Santa Cruz County Homeless 2000 Census and Needs Assessment, Executive Summary, On Line edition: http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/products/Homeless2000-ExecSumm.pdf, page 4.
[3] Ibid, Vehicularly Housed Profile, On Line edition: http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/products/Homeless2000-Profiles.pdf, page 19.
[4] Ibid, Paper Version, Census Findings, page 26
[5] Ibid, Paper Version, Executive Summary, page 7
[6] Ibid, page 93.
[7] The United Way, Santa Cruz County Homeless 2000 Census and Needs Assessment, Vehicularly Housed Profile, On Line edition: http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/products/Homeless2000-Profiles.pdf, page 7.
For More Information Contact:
Community Action Board of Santa Cruz County, Inc.
406 Main Street, Suite 207, Watsonville, CA 95076
Tel: 831/763-2147
FAX: 831/724-3447
eMail:
info@cabinc.org